Where we start
Raw muscle
75 watts, sustained over a working day
- Build
- What a crew can carry
- Society
- Small bands that move with the food
- Work
- Strength is most of the job
- Energy
- Food in, effort out, nothing else
A strong person can burst to about 1.2 horsepower for a moment. All day, it is about a tenth of one.
The lever
×10 force from a 10-to-1 lever, same 75 watts
Before
- You move what your arms can lift
- More stone means more people
After
- One person shifts ten times the load, slowly
- Ramps and ropes raise what arms never could
- The wheel turns up about 5,300 years ago
- Build
- The Great Pyramid, with under 7,000 workers by Vaclav Smil's count
- Society
- Crews, foremen, the first engineers
- Work
- Technique starts to beat size
- Energy
- None added: a lever trades distance for force
Crows can build a two-part tool. Only people build on the last generation's tools.
Fire
A kilo of dry firewood holds about 7 days of a labourer's work, as heat
Before
- Raw food and long chewing
- Cold and dark for half of every day
After
- Cooked egg protein: 91% digested, against 51% raw, in one small study
- Heat, light and longer evenings
- Kilns and furnaces, which every later era needs
- Build
- Pottery 20,000 years ago, copper smelting 7,000
- Society
- The hearth, the first shared room
- Work
- Hours after dark
- Energy
- The first energy from outside the body
Controlled fire about a million years ago, everyday use only 300,000 to 400,000 years ago.
Farming
×10, then ×100 people fed per square kilometre
Before
- About 0.1 people per square kilometre in Mesolithic France
- Everyone forages, every day
After
- 1 to 2 per square kilometre, then 10 to 20 by the Iron Age
- A surplus feeds people who never farm
- World population: 4.5 million to 232 million by year 0
- Build
- Uruk, the first city, about 50,000 people by 3200 BCE
- Society
- Kings, priests, soldiers, tax
- Work
- Specialists, because someone else grows the food
- Energy
- Sunlight stored in a granary
About 5,000 years from the first herds to the first city.
Draft animals
An ox is worth about 5 people, a horse about 8
Before
- Every field turned by hand
- Every load on a back
After
- An ox: about 450 watts for six hours a day
- The horse spreads across Eurasia from about 2200 BCE
- The horse collar, about 800 CE (how much it helped is still argued)
- Build
- Carts, roads, bigger fields
- Society
- Wealth that walks and breeds
- Work
- The ploughman and the carter
- Energy
- Muscle that runs on grass people cannot eat
Cattle about 10,500 years ago, draft animals common by about 3000 BCE.
Water and wind
A watermill does the work of about 20 people
Before
- Grain ground by hand, every day
- A warship rowed by 170 men
After
- A medieval mill: about 2 horsepower, freeing 30 to 60 grinders
- 5,624 watermills in England's Domesday Book, 1086
- Windmills in Europe from the 1180s
- Build
- A mill on every river that could turn one
- Society
- Whoever owns the mill takes a cut of every loaf
- Work
- Fewer hours at the grindstone
- Energy
- The first engines that never eat
About 1,300 years from the first Roman watermills to Domesday's 5,624.
Writing
Memory outside the head. No honest number
Before
- Everything known is remembered by someone
- A deal is only as good as a memory
After
- Clay tablets at Uruk, about 3350 BCE
- About 85% of the early tablets are accounts
- The first literature comes 700 years later
- Build
- Archives and storerooms
- Society
- Laws, contracts and taxes on record
- Work
- The scribe, the first office worker
- Energy
- None. A new kind of multiplier
Writing started as bookkeeping and stayed a specialist skill for thousands of years.
The printing press
×200 copying speed per worker
Before
- A scribe copies 6 to 12 pages a day
- One Bible takes one to two years
After
- A two-man press: about 3,400 sheets a day
- Book prices fall by two-thirds, 1450 to 1500
- 12.6 million printed books in Western Europe by 1500
- Build
- Print shops in about 270 cities by 1500
- Society
- Cities with presses grew 60% faster in the next century
- Work
- Scribes out, printers and booksellers in
- Energy
- Still muscle, but knowledge got cheap
50 years to reach 270 cities, about 100 to show up in city growth.
Steam and coal
By 1900, 48 people's worth of energy for every person in England
Before
- Power only where the river runs
- England in 1800: about 18 people's worth per person
After
- Watt's first engines: about 6 horsepower, 60 labourers
- Within 20 years, 190 horsepower
- Railways: 100 miles in 1830, 19,000 by 1901
- Build
- Factories, railways, cities of millions
- Society
- England is mostly urban by 1851
- Work
- The factory shift, the Luddites, then unions
- Energy
- 91% of England's energy from coal by 1850
About 140 years from Newcomen's engine (1712) to an economy that ran on coal.
Oil and electricity
About 90 people working round the clock, for every Canadian or American
Before
- Coal: heavy, bulky, tied to the rails
- Each factory turned by one giant shaft
After
- A barrel of oil does 4.5 to 11 years of a labourer's work
- The elevator (1857) and the steel frame (1885)
- Ford: 12.5 hours per car down to 93 minutes
- Build
- Skyscrapers, suburbs, air conditioning in 87% of US homes
- Society
- Cars, global trade, a middle class
- Work
- The 40-hour week: Ford 1926, US law 1940
- Energy
- Buckminster Fuller called them "energy slaves"
Electric factories took about 40 years to pay off, because every factory had to be redesigned around the motor.
Computers
×2,400: a trajectory in 30 seconds that took a person 20 hours
Before
- "Computer" is a job title: about 400 at NASA Langley in 1946
- 342,000 US telephone operators at mid-century
After
- ENIAC, 1946
- Today: 1.7 to 76 trillion times faster than hand calculation
- 1,460 telephone operators left in the industry by 2019
- Build
- Buildings and machines designed on screens
- Society
- Banks, airlines and governments run on databases
- Work
- Clerks, typists and operators replaced
- Energy
- Calculation starts to run on electricity
Robert Solow, 1987: "You can see the computer age everywhere but in the productivity statistics." The payoff came 1995 to 2004.
The internet
Reach: 6 billion people online in 2025
Before
- Three minutes, New York to London: $293 in 1931 (in 1993 dollars)
- You work where the work is
After
- The same call: under a cent
- 74% of the world online
- About a quarter of US paid workdays done at home
- Build
- Datacentres, and the office as an option
- Society
- Platforms, feeds, everyone a publisher
- Work
- US work from home: 7% of paid days in 2019, 27% in 2026
- Energy
- It built the archive: 300 billion pages, 60% of GPT-3's training text
About 30 years from ARPANET (1969) to most Americans online.
Now
AI
×? Thinking itself: reading, writing, coding, planning
Before
- Thinking is the one thing only people do
- Expertise takes a career to build
After, so far
- 39% of employed Americans use it for work in a given week
- The newest support agents about 30% more productive
- About 2% of all work hours saved
- Work
- Juniors first: 22 to 25-year-olds in exposed jobs already 19% behind
- Build
- The datacentre is the new mill
- Energy
- Datacentres: 415 TWh in 2024, about 945 by 2030 (IEA)
- Power
- A few companies own the multiplier
- Society
- Chatbots side with the user 49% more often than people do
If AI follows electricity, the big payoff lands in the 2030s.
What AI has changed so far, by the numbers
In the second quarter of 2026, 39.2% of employed Americans used generative AI for work in the past week, up from 28.2% two years earlier. It touched 6.3% of all work hours and, by the workers' own estimate, saved 2.2% of them (Bick, Blandin and Deming, St. Louis Fed). About one US business in five uses AI anywhere, and 37% of firms with 250 or more staff (Census Bureau, May 2026).
The controlled studies disagree with each other. Professionals writing with ChatGPT finished 40% faster with 18% better quality (Noy and Zhang, Science, 2023). BCG consultants using it on tasks inside its abilities did 12% more tasks, 25% faster; on a task just outside, they were 19 points less likely to get it right. Experienced open-source programmers took 19% longer with AI tools and believed they had been 20% faster (METR, 2025). In Denmark, two years of payroll records show no effect on earnings or hours larger than 2%.
The first sign in the job numbers is among the youngest workers. Stanford's Digital Economy Lab found employment for 22 to 25-year-olds in the most AI-exposed jobs 19% below where it would be had it kept pace with their less exposed peers, with no economy-wide displacement yet.
Three studies people quote, and what they found
Experts and the public disagree, by 25 points. In Pew Research Center's 2024 surveys, 64% of Americans expect AI to mean fewer jobs over the next 20 years. Of AI experts, 39% agree. Stanford's 2026 AI Index reprinted the finding, which is why it often gets called a Stanford study. The bigger gap in the same data is about how people do their jobs: 73% of experts expect AI to help, against 23% of the public.
AI lifts the bottom more than the top. In a study of 5,172 customer-support agents, an AI assistant raised issues resolved per hour by about 15% on average and about 30% for the newest and least-skilled agents. The most skilled agents got slightly faster, and the quality of their work slipped slightly (Brynjolfsson, Li and Raymond, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2025). It is one job at one company.
The machines flatter us. A 2026 Science study led by Stanford PhD candidate Myra Cheng tested 11 leading chatbots. They backed the user 49% more often than people did, even when the user described lying or causing harm. In experiments with 2,405 people, one flattering chat made people less willing to apologise or repair a conflict and more sure they were right, and people rated the flattering bots as more trustworthy.
My predictions, with dates
History gives the timing pattern and the studies give the direction. These are my calls, dated so I can be wrong in public.
| Area | What I expect | By | How sure |
| Work | Entry-level knowledge jobs shrink first and fastest. The 19% gap for young workers widens before anyone senior feels it. | 2028 | Likely |
| Code | Most new commercial software is written by machines and checked by people. | 2028 | Likely |
| Energy | Datacentre electricity roughly doubles, as the IEA expects, and becomes a local election issue wherever a big one is proposed. | 2030 | Likely |
| Buildings | Design, drawings and permitting shrink from months to days. Pouring concrete and wiring stay human. | 2032 | Fairly sure |
| Politics | The fight over who owns the compute looks like the old fight over who owned the oil fields. | 2030 | Fairly sure |
| Wages | Pay loses ground to whoever owns the machines, unless tax or labour law changes. The IMF already expects inequality to worsen in most scenarios. | 2032 | Fairly sure |
| Science | The first approved drug whose candidate was found by AI. Mathematics got there first. | 2030 | Toss-up |
| Productivity | The jump shows up in national productivity statistics, about as late after the tools arrived as electricity's did. | mid-2030s | Toss-up |
Mathematics already went through its whole fight with AI in 32 days: which profession goes next, and why.
Other people's predictions, on the record
- Goldman Sachs, April 2023: generative AI could expose the equivalent of 300 million full-time jobs to automation and raise global GDP 7% over ten years.
- Kristalina Georgieva, IMF, January 2024: almost 40% of global employment is exposed to AI, about 60% in advanced economies, and in most scenarios AI will likely worsen inequality.
- Daron Acemoglu, MIT, May 2024: AI raises total factor productivity by no more than 0.66% over ten years.
- Dario Amodei, Anthropic, May 2025: AI could wipe out about half of entry-level white-collar jobs and push US unemployment to 10% to 20% within one to five years. CNN noted he cited no evidence for the half.
- International AI Safety Report, chaired by Yoshua Bengio, January 2025: a few companies will likely dominate decisions about how general-purpose AI is built and used.
The pattern so far
My read
Each multiplier made an old strength cheap and paid for a new one. The lever paid technique over size. Farming paid organisers, printing paid readers, steam paid machinists, and computers paid people who could work with information. Nobody has the data yet for what AI pays. My guess is judgement: knowing what to ask for, and noticing when the machine is only telling you what you want to hear.
The timing is the part history is clearest on. Electricity was in factories by 1900 and in the productivity numbers by the 1920s. Computers were in offices by the 1960s and in the numbers by the late 1990s. Both times, the people who said nothing much was happening were right for twenty years and then wrong.
I am 60 and have been in publishing and software since 1991. Most days now I build by talking to AI, mostly alone: an 80s-style arcade game, a stock-research engine, and this page.
Sources
- Human power, 75 W sustained: Wikipedia, citing Marks' Standard Handbook; horsepower: Wikipedia
- Lever: HyperPhysics; pyramid workforce: Vaclav Smil, IEEE Spectrum; wheel: Ljubljana Marshes wheel; crows: von Bayern et al., Scientific Reports 2018
- Fire: Berna et al., PNAS 2012; Roebroeks and Villa, PNAS 2011; egg protein: Evenepoel et al., 1998; firewood energy: Forest Research; pottery: Wu et al., Science 2012
- Farming: French Ministry of Culture; world population: Our World in Data (HYDE); Uruk tablets: proto-cuneiform proposal
- Draft animals: IISc; horse origins: Librado et al., Nature 2021; horse collar: Lynn White, disputed by Weller
- Mills: Mills Archive; Munro, citing Reynolds; Domesday count: Hundred Parishes; trireme crew: Hellenic Ministry of Culture
- Printing: Dittmar, QJE 2011; books printed: Buringh and van Zanden, via Our World in Data; scribe speed: McCune Collection
- Steam and coal: University of Houston, Engines of Our Ingenuity; energy per person in England: Warde, Harvard energy history; railways: King's College London
- Oil and electricity: Our World in Data, energy per person; energy slaves; barrel of oil: Hagens, Ecological Economics 2020; dynamo lag: Paul David, AER 1990; Ford: The Henry Ford; air conditioning: US DOE; elevator and skyscraper: HistoryNet
- Computers: US Army Research Lab, ENIAC; Nordhaus 2007; telephone operators: Richmond Fed; NASA human computers: NASA; Solow: Wikiquote; late-1990s surge: Oliner and Sichel 2000
- Internet: ITU; call costs: The Geography of Transport Systems; work from home: WFH Research via FRED; Common Crawl; GPT-3 paper
- AI use and time saved: FRED Blog, Bick, Blandin and Deming; business use: US Census Bureau; studies: Noy and Zhang, Dell'Acqua et al., METR, Humlum and Vestergaard, Brynjolfsson, Chandar and Chen
- The three studies: Pew Research Center, 2025; Stanford AI Index 2026, chapter 9; Brynjolfsson, Li and Raymond, QJE 2025; Cheng et al., Science 2026
- Energy and AI: IEA, Energy and AI, 2025; US DOE on the LBNL report; productivity lag: Brynjolfsson, Rock and Syverson
- Predictions: Goldman Sachs; IMF; Acemoglu; Amodei interview, reprinted; International AI Safety Report
— Scott Covert. The predictions carry dates on purpose. If you have a number that should be on the chain, send it and I'll check it. Reach me here.